Special Education Case Loads Task Force — October 15, 2013

The Special Education Case Loads Task Force held their second meeting on Tuesday, October 15. The task force selected Don McNeil and Todd Travis as the co-chairs. 

In the first part of the meeting, we heard from Tom Melcher (Director of the Program Finance Division at the Minnesota Department of Education) about the special education funding changes that will be taking place in the next 3 years. One of those changes is that districts will be moving from a cost reimbursement method to a cross-subsidy reduction aid model. The two key methods of funding under this new model include census-based and weighted-student funding components. Funding generated under the new components, in theory, will help reduce the overall cross-subsidy for all special education services. Adding the new cross-subsidy reduction aid increases state funding for special education by $43 million over the biennium. The new formula will also reform the excess cost aid component and the special education tuition billing process. Even with all of these changes, which could cause an aid swing for districts, the new legislation guarantees that school districts will receive as much special education aid under the new formula for FY 2016 as they would have received under the old formula. It is also important to note that the very real $636 million statewide cross-subsidy stares every public school district in the face, even with a proposed increase in special education aid.

Barb Troolin, MDE’s Director of Special Education, and George Hold, MDE’s Special Education Funding Supervisor, provided the work group with a presentation on child count reporting and federal instructional settings. In the state of Minnesota, Specific Learning Disabilities, Speech or Language Impairment, and Other Health Disabilities remain the three largest identified groups with the Autism Spectrum Disorders category demonstrating the largest growth since 2003. 

The task force also heard a presentation on the history of the case load rule and the 2004 Workload Manual. It is important to differentiate “case load” from “workload” as the task force progresses. The Workload Manual provides “recommended” workload sizes for districts. The “case load” is the number of students for whom the teacher is the IEP manager. The “workload” refers to all of the activities required of a special education teacher. Generally, a larger case load will result in a larger workload as well. However, it is also important to understand that school districts use different instructional models for the identified special education students, which would likely influence the workload of a special education teacher. 

The last phase of the afternoon included a review of the inconsistent special education laws and rules. This specific issue — alignment of rules and laws — has been reviewed by legislatively created work groups at least twice within the last decade, but little, if any, progress is made on this issue. Even Minnesota’s Legislative Auditor recommended in the 2013 review of K-12 special education that the MDE should update its special education rules for consistency with Minnesota statutes.

It is terribly difficult to separate policy from funding issues. On the surface, case load size discussion seems like a fairly benign item, but the financial implications and how districts manage their employees will certainly be impacted by efforts to determine the appropriate size of a case load.

Some important questions for school leaders to consider:

1.  Who is in the best position to make decisions about the appropriate number of employees to serve our public school students?  Should state law dictate the number of teachers hired?  Or, should principals and superintendents have the authority to make such a decision?

2.  What are the additional costs that school districts may see if a case load limit is enacted into state law?

3.  Will the new special education funding formula change the behavior of school leaders?  If so, how? 

The Special Education Case Loads Task Force is scheduled to next meet Tuesday, November 5 from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. at the Minnesota Department of Education. 

If you have any questions or comments, please contact Kirk Schneidawind at kschneidawind@mnmsba.org

About mnmsba

The Minnesota School Boards Association, a leading advocate for public education, supports, promotes and strengthens the work of public school boards.
This entry was posted in Special Education Case Loads Task Force and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Special Education Case Loads Task Force — October 15, 2013

  1. Gangnam style fan says:

    So many children are being misdiagnosed with autism these days. Special education officials need to be on the look out for parents who push their doctors, or hire “special education advocates” to insist their children are really autistic when there is no OFFICIAL autism diagnosis for the child. In California, there is rampant abuse of the autism label among parents of young children trying to get their children extra help in the classroom, when if you look at these children, they are talking normally, walking, writing, reading and doing everything normal, but may only be “mentally ill” with bipolar, depression or have aphasia (loss of speech) or dysphasia (difficulty comprehending speech) due to subclinical or obvious seizures. Truly a problem situation that is rooted in the overall ignorance and confidence of doctors, psychologists, special education administrators and school psychologists to properly discern who is autistic and who is not. And WHAT other disorders and conditions can mimic autism. A truly autistic person always presents as being in their own world, they DO NOT answer your questions like normal non autistic children! You will see echolalia (repeating the same sentences or words) or you’ll see obsession on ONE or TWO subjects. You’ll see obsession on routines and rituals. Don’t be fooled by parents who want their children to be autistic because they themselves are mentally ill and don’t know how to care for their children. The last straw was when yet ANOTHER mom told me her child was diagnosed with “high functioning” autism, but “may be just PDD (pervasive developmental disorder)” When I asked her, “Well, does it bother you that your son may be labeled with autism when he really doesn’t have it?” the mother said, “I don’t really care. So long as he gets the services he needs in school.” There you have folks. The autism label is no longer about autism, it’s about people like Jenny McCarthy who never had an autistic child, but rode the autism wave and made millions off her books, and parents who don’t really have autistic children but are now costing taxpayers millions by having their children diagnosed with autism “for the services” and autism researchers who don’t give care if they are really including real autistic children and adults in their studies, cuz it’s just about money. No wonder there is an “epidemic” of autism, because there is an “epidemic” of people who are so CLUELESS about what autism is and isn’t it has created MASS chaos and confusion. Wake up people.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s